We demand to write an SEO headline under 80 characters, accurate to article. Primary entity front-loaded: likely „Palantir“ or „NHS“. The article focuses on Palantir’s NHS contract facing scrutiny after viral manifesto by Alex Karp. So primary entity could be Palantir (company). Apply strong verb: „faces scrutiny“ maybe „faces scrutiny“ is okay but „faces“ is a verb. Need strong precise verb: „blocks“, „unveils“, „slashes“, „warns“. Could use „faces“ is okay? Might be considered weak. Better: „draws criticism“ but not in list. Could use „faces scrutiny“ is acceptable? The rule says use a strong, precise verb — not „addresses“ or „discusses“ but „blocks,“ „unveils,“ „slashes,“ „warns.“ So we should pick one of those verbs. Could be „warns“ but who warns? Medact warns. But primary entity front-loaded: maybe „Medact warns NHS contract with Palantir…“ but primary entity would be Medact. However article’s main subject is Palantir’s NHS contract. The instruction: front-load the primary entity (person, place, org) for search visibility. The primary entity likely Palantir (org). So we need a headline starting with Palantir and a strong verb like „faces“ is not in list but maybe acceptable? They said not „addresses“ or „discusses“ but gave examples of strong verbs. It doesn’t say you must use only those, but you should use a strong precise verb like those. „Faces“ is somewhat weak but maybe okay. Could use „draws“ but not in list. Could use „sparks“ but banned. Could use „blocks“ – Palantir blocks? Not accurate. „Unveils“ – Palantir unveils? Not accurate. „Slashes“ – no. „Warns“ – Palantir warns? Not accurate. Maybe we can front-load Medact as primary entity? But article is about Palantir’s NHS contract; Medact is a group warning. The primary entity for search visibility could be „NHS contract“ but that’s not a person/place/org. Could be „NHS“. So headline: „NHS contract with Palantir draws criticism after Alex Karp manifesto“. Verb „draws“ not in list but maybe okay? The rule says use