China’s New Law Expands Legal Reach Beyond Borders
China’s Ethnic Unity and Progress Law, enacted on July 1, 2026, grants the state authority to pursue legal action against entities and individuals outside its territory accused of undermining ethnic unity. Article 63 explicitly states that “organizations and individuals outside the Chinese mainland committing acts that undermine China’s ethnic unity, progress, or create ethnic division may be legally prosecuted,” according to a translation. The provision triggered global alarm, particularly among human rights groups and political actors.
Amnesty Warns of Transnational Repression Risks
Amnesty International condemned the law as a “legitimate, lawful, necessary, and feasible legal provision” that could “enforce the Communist Party of China’s political ideology” and “institutionalize policies of forced assimilation.” Sarah Brooks, Amnesty’s deputy regional director, emphasized that “unity” in this context refers not to “harmony between communities” but “conformity with Beijing’s political line.” The UN’s special rapporteur on minority rights and cultural rights also criticized the law as an instrument of forced assimilation in regions like Tibet and Xinjiang, stating that “Chinese authorities are violating human rights obligations to protect minorities and their cultures.”
U.S. Congress Condemns Law with Bipartisan Measures
The U.S. Congress responded with a series of actions, including a Senate resolution and two joint letters. Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) warned in a letter to Chinese ambassador Xie Feng that the law “institutionalizes the Communist Party’s practices of erasing religious freedom.” The bipartisan approach underscored growing concerns over the law’s implications for global civil liberties.
UN Criticizes Law as Tool of Assimilation
The United Nations, including the special rapporteur for minority rights, labeled the law a mechanism for forced assimilation. Brooks reiterated that the legislation “does the opposite” of safeguarding minority cultures, citing its potential to suppress dissent and enforce ideological conformity. The backlash reflects broader anxieties about the law’s extraterritorial reach and its alignment with China’s domestic policies in contested regions.
Find more reporting in our Welt section.
